Princeton Theological Seminary has begun a study on the works of N.T. Wright called the “N.T. Wright Project” and will be blogging about it here.
A recent post called “Violence, Monsters, and the Ascension: Barth and Wright on the Problem of War” caught my eye since I’d been reading Barth and
love N.T. Wright. The post intends to juggle both Barth’s view on ethics and Wright’s view on discipleship in light of the debate between war and non-violence. Being a proponent of non-violent Christianity made the post irresistable. When you have a moment, read the post. I’m interested in hearing your comments here on this site.
Excerpt:
I’m with Barth in thinking that Christian ethics isn’t frozen and fixed but dynamic, since it constitutes obedience to the living Word that continues to be spoken today in Jesus Christ. But I don’t know if I can go along with Barth in leaving the possibility open that Jesus will command his followers to use violence and wage war. Here’s where we can bring Wright’s thoughts into play… more…
Q: How do you feel about Barth’s view on ethics?
Q: Do you agree or disagree with the author’s convergence of Barth’s and Wright’s thought?
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.





Wow, Wright never ceases to amaze me. I read those passages in Daniel and just scratch my head… but what he said finally makes sense to me… “one like the son of man” being someone human, who allowed himself to suffer and be killed, only to be raised again to life to reign over a kingdom of love. Yes, my spirit resonates with that. And as an added bonus, it is an interpretation that lines up with Jesus’ teachings. That’s always been my problem with the Just War stance. When I hold it up beside Jesus’ words in the Sermon and His life– it just doesn’t match up. I know there are serious complications (I am all the more aware, as a wife and mother, that there are complications); but I think Wright is closer to the heart of the matter than some others I’ve read.